News
Print Article

$1 billion laundered through a complex network of countries, shell companies and offshore bank accounts – lessons learned?

04/11/2024

Oct. 23, 2024—The indictment of Venezuelan media executive Raul Gorrin Belisario provides valuable insights into sophisticated money laundering techniques that exploit institutional banking vulnerabilities.  

This case is a stark reminder of the complexities involved in combating financial crimes and the importance of robust anti-money laundering measures.  

THE CASE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES:

  1. Venezuela - the home country of various individuals and entities involved in the case.
  2. United States - financial transactions occurring within.
  3. Switzerland – connected financial institutions and shell companies.
  4. Cayman Islands - connected financial institution.
  5. Hong Kong - location for shell companies.
  6. Panama – location of shell companies and financial activities.
  7. Latvia - location for banking relationships.
  8. Austria – location of banking transactions.
  9. New Zealand – location of a trust involved in the financial activities.
  10. St. Lucia - location of a bank account.
  11. Marshall Islands – location of a shell company.
  12. Scotland – location of a shell company  
  13. Canada - banking relationships.
  14. Germany - a national involved in the case.

OVERVIEW HERE ARE SOME KEY DETAILS:

  1. Raul Gorrin Belisario,
    • A Venezuelan media executive was recently indicted in Miami for his involvement in a massive money laundering scheme linked to Venezuela’s state oil company, PDVSA.
  2. Charges:
    • Gorrin is accused of laundering over $1 billion through a complex network of shell companies and offshore bank accounts.
  3. Bribery:
    • He allegedly paid millions in bribes to high-ranking Venezuelan officials to secure lucrative foreign currency exchange contracts with PDVSA.
  4. Use of Funds:
    • The laundered money was used to purchase luxury items such as real estate, yachts, and other high-value assets in the United States.
  5. Legal Proceedings Current Status:
    • Gorrin is currently a fugitive and remains at large. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison.

THE LAUNDERED MONEY WAS USED FOR

  1. Luxury asset purchases (yachts, aircraft) through multilayered company structures
  2. Real estate investments in high-value markets
  3. Aircraft insurance payments through separate corporate entities
  4. Use of specialised financial managers and asset management firms

KEY TAKEAWAY FOR AML PROFESSIONALS: THIS CASE HIGHLIGHTS THE IMPORTANCE OF ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE ON:

  1. Internal transfer patterns between related entities
  2. Transaction justification documentation
  3. Ultimate beneficial ownership verification
  4. PEP-related transaction monitoring.
  5. Cross-border structure analysis

CRITICAL MONEY LAUNDERING METHODOLOGIES IDENTIFIED:

  1. Money Laundering Techniques
    1. Shell Companies: Gorrin and his co-conspirators used a series of shell companies to conceal the origins and movement of the illicit funds.
    2. Offshore Accounts: To further obscure the money trail, they used bank accounts in various countries, including the U.S.
    3. Integration: The illicit funds were integrated into the financial system by purchasing luxury goods, making it difficult to trace the money back to its illegal origins.
  2. Institutional Vulnerabilities
    1. Banking System Exploitation: The case highlights how sophisticated money laundering schemes can exploit vulnerabilities in the global banking system, including using offshore accounts and shell companies to evade detection.
    2. Regulatory Gaps: They underscore the need for more robust regulatory frameworks and international cooperation to combat financial crimes.
  3. Initial Layering Structure:
    1. Used Hong Kong shell company (Eaton Global Services) for primary fund receipt.
    2. Executed sham joint venture contracts to justify fund movements.
    3. Employed internal transfers within the same financial institution to minimise external transfer scrutiny.
    4. Utilised parallel company structures in multiple jurisdictions (Hong Kong, Panama, Scotland, Marshall Islands)
  4. Fund Flow Concealment:
    1. Split proceeds between multiple shell companies using false documentation.
    2. Created tiered ownership structures with nominee directors.
    3. Used internal bank transfers to avoid external banking system scrutiny.
    4. Employed sham contracts to justify PEP-related transactions.
  5. Red Flags Identified:
    1. Complex ownership structures involving multiple jurisdictions.
    2. High-value transactions justified by vague consulting agreements.
    3. Frequent internal transfers between related entities
    4. Use of nominee directors from low-risk jurisdictions
    5. Involvement of politically exposed persons (PEPs)
    6. Large currency exchange transactions at preferential rates

https://www.comsuregroup.com/media/2y5fpt2x/us-florida-raul-gorrin.pdf

SOURCE:  

  1. https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/fcpa/cases/raul-gorrin-belisario
  2. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1374811/dl
  3. Miami-based Venezuelan Media Tycoon Raul Gorrin Indicted for Alleged Billion-Dollar Money Laundering Scheme Linked to PDVSA. https://hoodline.com/2024/10/miami-based-venezuelan-media-tycoon-raul-gorrin-indicted-for-alleged-billion-dollar-money-laundering-scheme-linked-to-pdvsa/.
  4. Venezuelan media mogul accused of billion-dollar fraud with PdVSA. https://www.curacaochronicle.com/post/local/venezuelan-media-mogul-accused-of-billion-dollar-fraud-with-pdvsa/.
  5. U.S. charges Venezuelan media tycoon with money laundering. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/us-charges-venezuelan-media-tycoon-with-money-laundering/ar-AA1sOQPm.

 

 

 

 

MONEY LAUNDERING YOUTUBE-IMAGE

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.