
$2 billion was stolen through a complex loan recycling scheme to move the money through offshore companies
14/08/2025
Former owners of Ukraine’s PrivatBank, Ihor Kolomoisky and Gennadiy Bogolyubov, have stolen nearly $2 billion from the bank before it was nationalised in 2016, a U.K. court ruled on Wednesday (July 23, 2025)
- The judge said the two used a “highly complex loan recycling scheme” to move the money through offshore companies for their benefit.
- The High Court in London found that both men were responsible for what the judge described as a “fraud of Byzantine complexity.”
- The ruling fully supports the claims brought by PrivatBank. With interest and legal costs, the amount owed is expected to exceed $2 billion.
PrivatBank Scandal (Ukraine)
- PrivatBank is Ukraine’s largest lender, serving more than 18 million customers.
- It was nationalised in 2016 after auditors found massive losses tied to insider lending and fraud.
Key Figures:
- Ihor Kolomoisky and Gennadiy Bogolyubov – former owners of PrivatBank.
Scheme:
- Between 2013 and 2016, the duo allegedly embezzled nearly $2 billion from PrivatBank using a loan recycling scheme:
- Issued sham loans to offshore companies they secretly controlled.
- Used fake trade documents to justify transfers.
- Laundered funds through foreign assets and shell firms
Legal Outcome:
- In July 2025, the UK High Court ruled in favour of PrivatBank, calling it a “fraud of Byzantine complexity.”
- The court found both men jointly and severally liable and criticised them for destroying evidence and refusing to testify
- Kolomoisky was detained in Ukraine in 2023 and faces charges of fraud, money laundering, and embezzlement
Reporting on July 30, 2025
- Former owners of Ukraine’s PrivatBank, Ihor Kolomoisky and Gennadiy Bogolyubov, have stolen nearly $2 billion from the bank before it was nationalised in 2016, a U.K. court ruled on Wednesday (2025)
- The judge said the two used a “highly complex loan recycling scheme” to move the money through offshore companies for their benefit.
- The High Court in London found that both men were responsible for what the judge described as a “fraud of Byzantine complexity.”
- The ruling fully supports the claims brought by PrivatBank. With interest and legal costs, the amount owed is expected to exceed $2 billion.
- Justice Richard Trower dismissed the pair’s defence, calling their case “built on dishonest foundations.” He said
- Kolomoisky acted as if he were “above the law,” and Bogolyubov tried to cover his tracks with misleading documents.
- Neither of them testified during the trial. According to the judge, they avoided the witness stand because they knew they couldn’t explain their actions.
- The court also found that Kolomoisky ordered the destruction of digital records, while Bogolyubov got rid of documents that could have been used as evidence.
- Meanwhile, Ukrainian anti-corruption officials are pursuing related criminal charges. Earlier in July, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) said it had finished an investigation into one of the bank’s former owners — widely believed to be Kolomoisky — and five others.
- They are accused of embezzling over $228 million through fake bond buybacks and laundering the money through offshore companies.
- Investigators say the plan was launched in 2015, while the main suspect was the governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region.
- PrivatBank obtained a worldwide asset freeze against both Kolomoisky and Bogolyubov in 2017.
- The bank says it will now begin efforts to recover the stolen funds- Chairman Nils Melngailis said
- . “This is a monumental victory for the Bank and our shareholder – the Government of Ukraine,”
- . “It shows the fraud was real, and that we were right to keep fighting.”
- Richard Lewis, a partner at Hogan Lovells, the law firm representing PrivatBank, said
- The case was “one of the most complex” seen by the U.K. courts.
- according to a press release by PrivatBank.
- the defendants “deliberately destroyed and suppressed documents and sought unsuccessfully to shift the blame onto others,”
References
[1] London Judge Rules: Ukrainian Tycoons Stole $2 Billion from PrivatBank https://www.occrp.org/en/news/london-judge-rules-ukrainian-tycoons-stole-2-billion-from-privatbank
[2] Supreme Court puts an end to oligarch Kolomoisky's appeal for restoring ... https://kyivindependent.com/kolomoisky-privatbank/
[3] The Russian Laundromat: How $20 Billion was Transferred from Russia to ...https://www.amlcube.com/post/the-russian-laundromat-how-20-billion-were-transferred-from-russia-to-the-rest-of-the-world
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.