News
Print Article

50 lawyers fined for AML rule breaches in the last six months and there is MORE TO COME

14/05/2025

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has handed out 50 fines totalling £575,000 for anti-money laundering (AML) rule breaches in the last six months and promised to “ratchet up the consequences” for firms that still do not comply.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip said this week:

  • “We are concerned that we’re still finding fairly basic deficiencies in AML arrangements within firms.”
  • “It’s probably not deliberate – it’s probably lots of smaller firms that are just not au fait [with the rules] or don’t have capacity or just not paid attention, but the fact is that not having things like a risk assessment in place increases the probability of money laundering.
  • “We’ve been saying this for years, so we will continue to ratchet up the consequences for people who don’t comply.”

The SRA has been handing out regular fines over the last couple of years. The main failures have been not having in place

  • A firm-wide risk assessment and/or
  • Policies, controls, and procedures to mitigate and manage effectively the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing and
  • Not undertaking client and matter risk assessments.

Since Legal Futures last reported on the fines in mid-December, there have been 50 more doled out, totalling around £575,000.

and as LEGAL FUTURES reported yesterday, the SRA is looking to speed up introduction of its new unlimited fining power for cases involving economic crime.

At the moment, the maximum fine the SRA

  • can impose on traditional law firms is £25,000, meaning it has to refer cases to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, which has unlimited fining powers, where it believes more is warranted.
  • However, the upper limit is £250m for alternative business structures, so the largest fines in the past six months have been for these firms, including
    • Yorkshire firm Holden Smith (£36,622),
    • Hayes & Storr in Norfolk (£34,046),
    • Nexus Solicitors in Manchester (£31,217) and
    • Tyndallwoods of Birmingham (£27,813).
  • Traditional firms fined at or near the limit include
    • Reading firm Harrisons (£25,000),
    • Underwood Solicitors in central London (£25,000),
    • Hertfordshire practice Duffield Harrison (£25,000),
    • Hunter’s in High Wycombe (£24,820) and
    • London firm Statham Gill Davies (£24,498).

The Duffield Harrison sanction

  • Specifically states that, after applying the SRA fining guidance and reducing the amount for mitigation, the final figure was £26,359 but that it would be “wholly disproportionate” to send the case to the tribunal.

Manchester sole practitioner Lisa Tonge

  • The smallest fine of the 50 was £658, given to Manchester sole practitioner Lisa Tonge.
  • The fine is based on a practice’s turnover.

2025 targets

  • The SRA’s target is to conduct 700 AML inspections of law firms – both desk-based and onsite – in the year to 31 October 2025.
  • Its latest performance report shows that it delivered 297 in the first four months of the year, 128% of the target.
  • Papers from the most recent SRA board meeting also showed that the regulator is planning another data-gathering exercise from the whole profession about AML, sanctions, and suspicious activity reports.
  • It will start at the end of June and run for six weeks.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip told the board

  • “The information obtained will be used to improve our understanding of risk and how we allocate our resources effectively,”
  • Explaining that it used machine learning to help prioritise which firms to look at.

Professional Body Anti-money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS

SOURCE

https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-to-ratchet-up-aml-blitz-after-575000-of-fines-in-six-months

UNITED KINGDOM MONEY LAUNDERING

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.