Airbus Kept in Touch With Middleman on Controversial Kuwait Helicopters Deal as Bribery Probe Unfolded
24/10/2024
Emails obtained by OCCRP reporters show that Senior Airbus executives corresponded with an intermediary regarding controversial helicopter deals in Kuwait after the European company came under scrutiny for its dealings with intermediaries.
Key Findings
- Airbus’s current CEO corresponded with a middleman in a Kuwait helicopter deal as the company’s dealings with intermediaries came under investigation.
- In October 2015, months after Airbus apparently stopped paying intermediaries, a senior executive thanked the middleman for agreeing to a reduced payment.
- The correspondence helped the middleman win an arbitration against Airbus that required them to pay him 12 million euros.
- A Kuwaiti parliamentary probe alleged that Airbus engaged in “fraud and deception” to secure the helicopter deal and paid “commissions” despite promising not to. Airbus declined to comment.
Introduction
- Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury personally communicated with a middleman in a Kuwait helicopter deal even as the aerospace giant was under investigation in other countries for using intermediaries to bribe customers.
- Airbus Helicopters, led by Faury at the time, has said it stopped paying intermediaries in the spring of 2015.
- But correspondence obtained by OCCRP and French outlet Revue XXI shows Faury was still sending emails well into 2016 to an intermediary, Farid Abdelnour, about a contract to provide Kuwait’s defence ministry with 30 military helicopters. Another Airbus executive emailed Abdelnour in 2016 about payment for his work.
- Abdelnour later used some of his correspondence with Airbus to successfully bring a 12-million-euro arbitration case against Airbus for non-payment of invoices.
- After Kuwaiti officials learned of the arbitration, they investigated whether the payment constituted “commissions” on the contract, despite assurances by Airbus that none had been or would be paid, according to leaked correspondence between Airbus and the Kuwaiti government.
- In January, Kuwait’s parliament accused Airbus of using “fraud and deception” and claimed 349 million euros in wasted Kuwaiti public funds.
- In 2020, Airbus struck “deferred prosecution agreements,” $3.9 billion deals with French, U.K., and U.S. prosecutors to avoid charges over suspect payments made to middlemen to secure contracts in at least a dozen countries.
- The deals are “deferred prosecution agreements,” which suspend criminal proceedings in exchange for the defendant meeting certain conditions and paying a fine.
Click below to read the full investigation by Sana Sbouai, Clément Fayol, and Antoine Harari.
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.