BDO Fined £5.9 Million in UK for Failing to Prevent Ex-Manager’s “Dishonest” Conduct
07/11/2025
Overview
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has fined BDO LLP £5.85 million (after settlement discount) for serious audit failings that allowed a senior manager to pursue a “dishonest course of conduct” undetected for several years.
Two former audit engagement partners were also sanctioned with fines and bans from audit work.
Read the official FRC announcement:
👉 https://www.frc.org.uk/news-and-events/news/2025/11/frc-imposes-sanctions-against-bdo-llp-and-two-audit-engagement-partners/
WHAT HAPPENED
- BDO and a pair of the firm’s former audit engagement partners have been hit with sanctions and hefty fines following admissions of misconduct in relation to an ex-manager who was found to have created fake documents, deleted records and copied e-signatures.
- The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has imposed the sanctions against BDO, John Everingham and Kevin Cook.
- This was on the back of formal complaints being made against each of the respondents earlier this year surrounding their conduct in circumstances where Amanda Nightingale, a senior manager at the time, was able to pursue, undetected, what the FRC called a “dishonest course of conduct on numerous audits between 2015 and 2019”.
- This included creating false audit evidence, causing auditor’s reports to be issued without approval from the relevant audit engagement partner, and inserting electronic copies of the audit engagement partners’ signatures in auditor’s reports without their approval.
- Nightingale was subsequently banned for 20 years and resigned from the firm a day before her hearing was set to take place. As such, it did not proceed.
- In total, there were 49 admitted instances of misconduct between 2015 and 2019.
SUMMARY
Between 2015 and 2019, senior manager Amanda Nightingale:
- Created false audit evidence
- Issued auditor’s reports without partner approval
- Inserted electronic copies of partners’ signatures into audit reports without consent
(Source: BusinessCloud)
The misconduct went undetected due to systemic failures in BDO’s internal controls and supervision, which the FRC described as “fundamentally flawed”.
BDO admitted that its systems from 2012 to 2019 were inadequate to prevent such misconduct.
(Source: AccountingWEB)
Sanctions Imposed
- BDO LLP:
- Fine: £6.5 million, reduced to £5.85 million after settlement
- Severe reprimand
- Must repay audit fees linked to affected audits
- Required to report to the FRC every six months for two years
- Additional £716,000 to cover FRC costs
(Source: FRC Announcement) - John Everingham (former partner):
- Fine: £189,000
- Six-year ban from audit work
- Kevin Cook (former partner):
- Fine: £90,000
- Three-year ban from audit work
(Source: AccountingWEB)
Regulator’s Statement
Jamie Symington, Deputy Executive Counsel at the FRC, said:
- “These failures gave rise to circumstances in which misconduct could occur and remain undetected. The misconduct was extremely serious and continued over a period of years.”
(Source: AccountingWEB)
Broader Implications
The case highlights:
- Audit quality risks when internal controls are weak
- The importance of partner oversight in preventing fraud
- Growing regulatory pressure on mid-tier firms to meet high audit standards
BDO has since conducted a forensic investigation and claims to have strengthened its systems and controls to prevent recurrence.
SOURCE
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.