“Big firm” executives are rarely held accountable for economic crime, financial wrongdoing, and/or regulatory breaches.
01/09/2024
A major review published today by Spotlight on Corruption shows that senior executives at the helm of large British companies that engage in economic crime, financial wrongdoing, or regulatory breaches almost never face any consequences.
The new report reveals:
- All the top bodies responsible for prosecuting serious economic and financial crime are struggling to land prosecutions against senior executives in large firms, effectively putting them beyond the law.
- Just 6% of investigations under the government’s flagship Senior Managers regime, introduced in the wake of the financial crisis to hold bank bosses to account, have resulted in any enforcement action whatsoever.
- The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) failed to prosecute any board-level senior executives in large firms following 11 prosecutions;
- The Serious Fraud Office has achieved just two convictions following 20 corporate enforcement actions and
- The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) took just one regulatory action against an individual following 17 fines on banks (worth a total of £777 million) for money laundering.
- Directors from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are far more likely to face conviction, regulatory fines, and bans than senior executives in large firms.
- Regulators often see SMEs as “low-hanging fruit.” Large firms are likely to face lower corporate fines relative to turnover than SMEs.
Dr Susan Hawley, Executive Director of Spotlight on Corruption, said:
- “After every corporate scandal, from the financial crash to the Post Office, there are rightly calls for senior executives to face accountability – but this rarely happens.
- Whether it’s Airbus’ global bribery scheme or NatWest’s money laundering, senior executives evade any responsibility.
- This lack of accountability is bad for British business, the UK economy, and the British people.”
The UK government recently dropped plans to introduce corporate governance reforms and is consulting on whether to reform the senior managers' regime.
The report finds that the UK is becoming dangerously out of step with the USA, which has much stronger enforcement against directors and is expanding bonus clawback in light of evidence about its positive impact on corporate governance and business growth.
The report lays out nine crucial recommendations to improve senior executive accountability in the UK. These include introducing a new criminal offence to help bring senior executives to justice when their company engages in economic crime and creating a task force to ensure the different regulators work together to develop a coherent prosecution strategy.
The senior executive's report
- Dr Susan Hawley and Dr Daniel Beizsley wrote the new report Power Without Responsibility: The State of Senior Executive Accountability for Economic Crime in the UK Today.
- It examined four different forms of senior executive accountability for economic crime in the UK: prosecution, regulatory action, disqualification, and removal of directors’ benefits.
- The report's implications will be discussed in Parliament at an event on Wednesday, February 7th, at 5 p.m., hosted by the APPG on Anti-Corruption & Responsible Tax and chaired by Dame Margaret Hodge MP.
- According to recent polling by the UK Anti-Corruption Coalition, https://www.ukanticorruptioncoalition.org/work/report-reflections-economic-crime
- 42% of the UK public associates economic crime with senior executives of big business—almost on a par with oligarchs and kleptocrats.
- Last year’s Ipsos Veracity Index noted that just 30% of the UK public trusts business leaders to tell the truth. https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/ipsos-trust-in-professions-veracity-index-2023
The executive summary and the full report can be downloaded using the links below.
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.