Cayman Islands Reaffirms Legitimate‑Interest Only Access to Beneficial Ownership Register
18/03/2026
Defies UK push for full public access
A significant policy development has emerged in the Cayman Islands’ approach to beneficial ownership transparency.
Despite renewed pressure from the United Kingdom, Cayman lawmakers have formally reinforced their commitment to a restricted-access model, limiting the availability of beneficial ownership information to individuals with a demonstrable legitimate interest.
1. Cayman Parliament Updates the Access Fee Structure
On 10 March 2026, the Cayman Islands Parliament passed a government motion amending the fee structure for accessing the beneficial ownership register.
- A new $250 annual fee now allows approved users with a legitimate interest to conduct multiple searches throughout the year.
- The fee for a single search increased from $30 to $75, the government stating this adjustment covers administrative costs.
The updated regulation — the Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Legitimate Interest Access) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 — is part of one of Cayman’s most critical financial transparency laws.
2. Access Limited to Those With a “Legitimate Interest”
Under these rules, only individuals or entities that can demonstrate a valid interest may access the register. This includes:
- Journalists
- Civil society organisations
- Financial crime investigators
- Potential business counterparties
- Businesses entering into or conducting a business relationship with the relevant legal person (i.e., CDD context)
Premier André Ebanks emphasised that Cayman will not move towards a fully open, public‑facing ‘Google‑style’ register, despite UK pressure.
UK Reaction: Minister Stephen Doughty Calls for Full Public Access
- UK Minister of State for the Overseas Territories, Stephen Doughty, said he wants beneficial ownership registers in all British Overseas Territories — including the Cayman Islands — to be fully publicly accessible.
However:
- Doughty also acknowledged ongoing progress in Cayman’s transparency framework.
- During his visit, he noted Cayman’s solid regulatory practices and their importance for combating illicit finance.
This highlights a divergence between the UK’s preference for open access and Cayman’s legitimate‑interest model, but also reflects a period of constructive engagement.
The Broader Context
- Cayman maintains that it meets or exceeds FATF (Financial Action Task Force) standards and that the legitimate‑interest regime is likely to become an international norm.
- A FATF re‑evaluation in 2027 is looming, and the Cayman government sees other compliance priorities as more urgent than transitioning to full public access.
Key Takeaways
1. Cayman is standing firm.
The Islands are deliberately resisting the UK’s push for complete public disclosure of beneficial ownership data.
2. Access remains controlled and subject to verification.
Only vetted users with a legitimate interest can view the register, and they will now pay updated fees to reflect administrative processing.
3. The UK wants full transparency but recognises Cayman’s progress.
While Stephen Doughty continues to champion public access, he also acknowledges the jurisdiction’s responsible regulatory posture and strong anti-money-laundering efforts.
4. The debate mirrors global uncertainty.
Worldwide, standards for beneficial ownership transparency continue to evolve, with varying levels of public accessibility.
Sources
- [caymancompass.com], https://www.caymancompass.com/2026/03/13/cayman-unified-on-legitimate-interests-for-beneficial-ownership/
- [ifcreview.com] https://www.ifcreview.com/news/2026/march/cayman-cayman-unified-on-legitimate-interests-for-beneficial-ownership/
- https://caymannewsservice.com/2025/09/minister-pleased-with-caymans-progress-on-bo-register/
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.