News
Print Article

Gibraltar Savings Bank scandal - explosive 2025 Principal Auditor’s report

14/08/2025

It has been reported that there is a scandal brewing in Gibraltar.

  • The Gibraltar Savings Bank scandal centres around allegations of government interference, lack of transparency, and potential misuse of public funds,
  • As revealed in the explosive 2025 Principal Auditor’s report.

From open-source information, here is a summary of the key issues reported:

Audit Obstruction & Constitutional Concerns

  • Chief Minister Fabian Picardo was accused of acting unconstitutionally by preventing Principal Auditor Anthony Sacramento from conducting a compliance audit of the Gibraltar Savings Bank (GSB).
  • Sacramento claimed this obstruction was part of a broader pattern of blocking scrutiny of public finances, including anti-money laundering processes at the GSB.
  • The government responded by asserting that the Principal Auditor lacked statutory authority to conduct such audits, and that PwC, a private firm with relevant expertise, was already auditing GSB.

£50.5 Million Loan Note Controversy

  • The Gibraltar Social Democrats (GSD) raised alarms over £50.5 million in loan notes issued by the GSB to finance a previously unknown entity linked to the government’s National Economic Plan.
  • Critics described the transaction as opaque and complex, with concerns about whether it was disclosed correctly or justified.
  • The government defended the investment as strategic and beneficial, claiming it had invested adequately in national infrastructure projects.

Transparency & Governance Issues

  • The Principal Auditor’s report also highlighted:
    • £13 million in ex-gratia payments made without adequate explanation.
    • Unusual transfers of police officers to other public sector roles, possibly linked to the McGrail Commission of Inquiry.
    • Obstruction of access to information by senior officials, including the Chief Secretary and Director of Personnel.

Government's Defence

  • The government dismissed the report as politically biased and claimed Sacramento acted outside his remit.
  • It emphasised that GSB undergoes regular audits by PwC, and that the Auditor’s criticisms were factually and legally incorrect.

Implications

  • Public trust in Gibraltar’s financial governance has been shaken.
  • The scandal may impact Gibraltar’s international reputation, especially after its recent removal from the money laundering high-risk list.
  • Calls for reform include establishing a Public Accounts Committee and updating outdated audit legislation.

Legal Implications - Constitutional Breach:

The Gibraltar Constitution states the Principal Auditor must be independent and not subject to government control. Blocking the audit may violate this principle

  • Audit Authority Dispute:
    • Government claims the Auditor lacks statutory power to audit GSB under POCA, citing reliance on PwC for AML audits.
    • Sacramento disputes this, citing constitutional and legislative authority
  • Transparency Failures:
    • Allegations of ex-gratia payments, opaque financial transfers, and politically motivated appointments raise concerns about public finance mismanagement
  • Potential AML Breaches:
    • Blocking an AML audit could undermine Gibraltar’s AML framework, especially given the £10 million court settlement indirectly funded by GSB.

References

FRAUD CORRUPTION YOUTUBE-IMAGE

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.