Jersey financial service entity held a fake Prince’s stolen funds 👀
22/07/2022
Key facts
- JUST over half-a-million dollars has been returned to the United States from a Jersey-based account in a case involving a man who pretended to be a fictitious Saudi prince.
- The US authorities identified $625,000 transferred to a Jersey-based account from one held in the name of an investment company set up by the fraudster Gignac and his co-conspirator.
- And On 4 February this year, the Royal Court granted a saisie judiciaire – a formal means of restraining assets – and registered the second order of forfeiture made in the US.
Read the story
Gignac would broker meetings between potential victims and the fictitious Prince, producing documents supposedly issued by high-ranking Saudi officials, a Saudi law firm, and a Jersey-based financial entity.
JUST over half-a-million dollars has been returned to the United States from a Jersey-based account, in a case involving a man who pretended to be a fictitious Saudi prince.
The Attorney General said it demonstrated that Jersey was no place for criminals to conceal their illicit assets.
Mark Temple QC was commenting on the case of Colombian-born Anthony Gignac, who was indicted by a Grand Jury in the Southern District of Florida and subsequently jailed for more than 18 years in 2019.
Gignac, a Michigan-raised resident of South Florida, pretended to be the fictional Khalid Bin Al-Saud, posting photographs of members of the real House of Saud on his Instagram account to support a bogus identity founded on fake business cards, false diplomatic licence plates on his car and a fake US diplomatic security service badge for his bodyguard.
Alongside his co-conspirators, Gignac would broker meetings between potential victims and the fictitious Prince, producing documents supposedly issued by high-ranking Saudi officials, a Saudi law firm, and a Jersey-based financial entity
To complete the illusion, Gignac would adopt traditional Saudi attire, and the meetings would always be conducted in line with traditional protocol.
In this way victims were induced to present him with expensive gifts, such as jewellery and artworks, as well as invest in fraudulent business deals.
Using the proceeds of his criminal activity, Gignac leased a two-bedroom apartment at a cost of $18,500 per month, funded the use of a private jet, and purchased a yacht, numerous luxury cars, jewellery, and designer clothing.
In addition, US authorities identified $625,000 transferred to a Jersey-based account from one held in the name of an investment company set up by Gignac and his co-conspirator.
According to the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, he defrauded at least 26 victims from at least five countries out of more than $8 million in a criminal career spanning more than 30 years.
On 4 February this year, the Royal Court granted a saisie judiciaire – a formal means of restraining assets – and registered the second order of forfeiture made in the US.
Part of the frozen funds were returned directly to some of Gignac’s victims, and earlier this month $528,973.72 was repatriated to the US to assist with compensating other victims.
Attorney General Mark Temple QC said:
- ‘Once again this case demonstrates that Jersey is no place for criminals to conceal their illicit assets, and that every effort will be made to assist our counterparts overseas in ensuring that the victims of financial crime have their rightful assets restored.’
Sources
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6956164640531693568/
https://www.channel103.com/news/jersey/529k-repatriated-after-fake-saudi-prince-jailed/
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.