
Judges say:- Jersey can substantiate the allegation of money laundering connected to a $13 billion company sale
08/09/2025
Following the Comsure’s posting in July about a reported investigation into money laundering and breaches of sanctions tied to a $13 billion company sale by Roman Abramovich, The Guardian newspaper has now reported
- Roman Abramovich is under investigation in Jersey over corruption and money-laundering claims
IT HAS BEEN REPORTED [7 SEPT 2025] BY THE GUARDIAN NEWSPAPER THAT:-
- SWISS JUDGES SAY MONEY LAUNDERING AND SANCTION BREACHES WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN JERSEY
- Court documents show that Roman Abramovich is the subject of a criminal investigation by the Jersey authorities over allegations of
- THE SWISS JUDGES DECIDED
- Jersey had presented enough evidence “to substantiate the allegation of money laundering with bribery as a predicate offence”.
- THE SWISS JUDGES CONCLUDED:
“Billions of dollars in assets were transferred transnationally via various offshore companies, trusts, and banks, including to Switzerland, without any discernible economic reason.
Such actions are likely to thwart the identification, discovery, or confiscation of assets.
Whether the assets are of legal origin, as the complainant appears to claim, cannot be assessed at this point.
This will be the subject of the criminal proceedings in Jersey.”
THE SWISS CASE/JUDGMENTS CAN BE VIEWED HERE
The Guardian reports as follows:-
- The information has emerged from the federal criminal court in Switzerland, where judges ordered the release of documents relating to multiple Swiss bank accounts that the Jersey attorney general had requested.
- Jersey’s authorities have been battling companies suspected of being connected to the Russian oligarch in the Swiss courts as part of their investigation into his vast wealth.
- Jersey has frozen more than $7bn (£5.2bn) of assets suspected of being linked to Roman Abramovich soon after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.
- According to the Swiss rulings, Jersey investigators are looking into the very origins of the oligarch’s wealth, acquired during the chaotic, freewheeling rise of capitalism in Russia in the 1990s and 2000s.
- Abramovich, through his lawyers, denied the allegations and said any suggestion he was involved in criminal activity was false.
The news article is here:- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/07/roman-abramovich-under-investigation-jersey-corruption-money-laundering-claims
Extracts from the article is below:-
MAY 2025
- Lawyers acting for the companies had been seeking to block the release of documents relating to Swiss bank accounts they held.
- Their appeal was rejected in May 2025, with Swiss judges saying that Jersey had presented enough evidence to justify handing over the documents.
- Copies of the judgments set out how Jersey made its request to Switzerland in connection with two distinct matters.
- Two rulings
- The first concerned
- Suspected money laundering in connection with the proceeds of the sale by Abramovich of his oil and gas company Sibneft, which the Russian government acquired for $13bn in 2005.
- The rulings state that the former Chelsea proprietor “is alleged to have made corruption payments in the 1990s” while he was building Sibneft into a major fossil fuels group.
- The second relates to
- Potential sanctions breaches involving the transfer of assets suspected of being connected to the oligarch just after he was placed on the Jersey sanctions list following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
- The 2024 rulings follow a court ruling in 2023 that revealed that Jersey’s ECONOMIC CRIME AND CONFISCATION UNIT (ECCU)
- Was investigating suspected sanctions breaches
- But made no mention of any investigation related to Sibneft.
- Although the Swiss rulings anonymise names, they disclose other details about the parties and circumstances.
- The judges decided that these details could be disclosed because the existence of proceedings against Abramovich was already known to the public.
- The Swiss rulings set out the arguments made by the Jersey attorney general in a series of requests for mutual legal assistance to obtain banking documents from Switzerland.
- The requests were made between June 2022 and May 2023.
- The anonymised rulings state:
- “G is alleged to have made corruption payments (so-called Krysha) to H in the 1990s to
- Maintain control over the Russian COMPANY I or
- To ensure the survival of the BUSINESSES OF G AND I.
- In 2003 and 2005, G sold its shares in I for $3bn and $13bn, respectively.”
- The details indicate that
- “G” is a reference to Abramovich,
- H to Berezovsky, and
- I to Sibneft.
JERSEY SUSPECT MONEY LAUNDERING AND SANCTION BREACHES
- The Jersey authorities believe the money found its way into various bank accounts, of which the oligarch was the beneficiary.
- The ruling states.
- “The Jersey authorities accuse G of money laundering in this context,”
- They are also investigating financial transactions made at about the time Abramovich was placed on the sanctions list by Jersey on 10 March 2022, specifically whether companies indirectly under his control traded assets.
- They continued to provide financial services in violation of sanctions law.
- Sanctions violations are a criminal offence in Jersey, punishable by a prison sentence or fines.
- After Russia invaded Ukraine, Abramovich was placed under sanctions by several European countries.
- The UK, whose sanctions on Russia are automatically applied by Jersey, justified its decision by describing him as one of several oligarchs “closely associated” with Putin’s regime.
JERSEY’S INVESTIGATION “POLITICALLY MOTIVATED”?
- According to the Swiss rulings.
- Lawyers for the companies in the dispute have argued that Jersey’s investigation was “politically motivated”,
- Their appeal (the rulings state), lodged in 2024, requested explanations from the Jersey authorities as to:
- “Why they waited until 2022 to open an investigation into alleged money-laundering allegations in connection with an alleged act of corruption that occurred in the 1990s and which the Jersey authorities must have been aware of since 2012 at the latest”
LAWYERS FOR ABRAMOVICH SAID
- In a statement, lawyers for Abramovich
- Denied the allegations and said their client had not been charged with any crime.
- “Any suggestion that Mr Abramovich has been involved in criminal activity is false.”
- “No charges have been brought against our client, and there are no criminal proceedings in Jersey involving our client;
- the Jersey court has, in fact, confirmed that there are no criminal proceedings against our client pending before the Jersey courts.”
JERSEY AG SAID
- A spokesperson for the Jersey attorney general’s office said that they could not comment on live investigations.
Background
- Abramovich sold his controlling stake in Sibneft to the Russian government in 2005. The deal propelled him into the ranks of the global super-rich.
- The Sibneft billions were the subject of a widely reported dispute with his former associate, Boris Berezovsky, which culminated in a high-stakes legal battle in London’s High Court in 2012.
- Berezovsky sued Abramovich, claiming the men had a partnership agreement to share the enormous fortunes generated by the formation of Sibneft.
- Abramovich claimed, among other things, that there was no formal agreement.
- During the trial, Abramovich also claimed that to obtain political influence and protection for his business interests, he had paid Berezovsky, a well-connected businessman, hundreds of millions of dollars in return for krysha.
- The word krysha literally means “roof” and is used to refer to protection or patronage in Russia.
- The judge found for Abramovich.
To read the Guardian article
Comsure postings
- Jersey 2025 investigates money laundering and breaches of sanctions tied to a $13 billion company sale.[15/07/2025]
- Back in the news - The $13 billion sale of Sibneft in 2005 - Jersey’s Role via Millhouse Capital [15/07/2025]
- Jersey seeks Swiss help in its $13 billion sales proceeds, money laundering, and sanctions breaches investigation[02/07/2025]
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.