News
Print Article

NCA says law firms missed money laundering red flags in UWO seizure case.

02/07/2024

New court disclosures and revelations come six years after Mrs Zamira Hajiyeva became the first person in the UK to be served with an “unexplained wealth order” under legislation passed by Parliament.

In London, a case management hearing at the High Court has sat ahead of a planned trial next year to determine whether Mrs Zamira Hajiyeva assets [some listed below] can be seized by the NCA on the grounds that they were bought with the proceeds of her husband’s criminal activities

THE ASSETS INCLUDE

  • Grade II listed Walton Street house,
  • Two parking spaces outside the property, and
  • Mill Ride Golf Club in Berkshire [which she also owns via a trust],.

A court statement by the NCA says

  • The Grade II listed Walton Street house, which the agency is trying to seize from jailed banker’s wife Zamira Hajiyeva, was bought by an associate of her husband [Khagani Bashirov] Jahangir using some of the fortune he had plundered from the International Bank of Azerbaijan.

Separate court proceedings are also underway in which the NCA is seeking the forfeiture of Mrs Hajiyeva’s multi-million-pound jewellery collection.

NCA REVELATIONS

The NCA documents say that law firm Mishcon de Reya was used to buy the £15million Knightsbridge home, the NCA says:-

  • The associate, Khagani Bashirov, was subjected to only “limited” checks by Mishcon de Reya under “know your client” duties before it carried out the conveyancing to allow him to complete the purchase in 2009 through a British Virgin Islands company that he owned.
  • That the funds used for the purchase had previously been channelled “through multiple company bank accounts held in multiple jurisdictions...in a manner designed to create maximum distance between Mr Hajiyev and the property” so that his “unlawful activities” in defrauding his bank could go undetected.
  • That in a further step to conceal the illicit transfers – which included the use of fictious documents and fake descriptions of the companies’ activities - there was no written agreement between the banker and Mr Bashirov and that the arrangement between them was based on trust.

That meant that Mishcon de Reya was unaware that:-

  • The home was being bought for Mr Hajiyev and thought it was being purchased by Mr Bashirov, an Azerbaijani who acquired French citizenship in 2008, for him to live in.

But the court document states that:-

  • “18 months later, changes were made to enable the property to be moved into a legal arrangement for the benefit of the Hajiyev family”.
  • Subsequent alterations in the ownership structure ended with the home being owned by Mrs Hajiyeva, who spent £16million at Harrods on jewellery and other luxury items before her husband’s imprisonment in Azerbaijan halted her lavish spending.
  • That mortgage interest payments relating to the Walton Street home and the money used to pay off the loan also came via money laundering, listing the complex chain of transactions deployed in each case.

The NCA court submission states, adding that:-

  • “Virtually all of the funds used to purchase 12-14 Walton Street were stolen from the International Bank of Azerbaijan,”
  • “ Monies reached Mishcon after being channelled through a number of bank accounts held in Cyprus, Estonia, Luxembourg and Switzerland.

The accounts were controlled by Mr Bashirov and had no recorded connection to Mr Hajiyev:-

  • “The reason the transaction was structured in this way was because the funds used to purchase the property represented the proceeds of Mr Hajiyev's unlawful conduct, and to disguise Mr Hajiyev's interest in 12-14 Walton Street, and his connection with those proceeds of unlawful conduct.”

The NCA court document says to hold assets on behalf of Mr Hajiyev and to channel monies towards those assets that as well as the British Virgin Islands, Mr Bashirov set up companies in

  • “St Kitts and Nevis, Panama, Cyprus, Luxembourg, and the UK

Bank accounts used to move what the document says were “huge sums” in a “short period of time” included accounts in

  • Russia, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and Estonia.

The document states that some of the companies and individuals involved in the transactions, including Mr Hajiyev and Mr Bashirov, were connected to the “Azerbaijan laundromat” money laundering scheme.

It also discloses that after buying the Walton Street home for Mr Hajiyev, his “nominee” Mr Bashirov was arrested in Azerbaijan in 2010 over embezzlement allegations and briefly imprisoned.

The document adds that the criminal investigation against Mr Bashirov was later halted, despite a guilty plea, because it was his first offence and the losses had been recouped, and that Mr Bashirov was subsequently placed under investigation by police in Luxembourg over suspected money laundering.

Mrs Hajiyeva has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and insisted:-

  • That Mr Hajiyev, who is in prison in Baku serving a 16.5-year jail term for defrauding his bank,
  • Bought the properties with a lawfully earned fortune first made during the “Wild West” conditions which prevailed in Azerbajan in the 1990s after the fall of communism.

But the NCA court submission, written by its financial investigator Nicola Bartlett, insists:-

  • That the both the Walton Street home, which was bought for £11.5million but later valued at £15million, and the Mill Ride Golf Club, which cost £10.7million in 2013, have “been obtained through unlawful conduct”.
  • “Mr Hajiyev has, with the assistance of a large number of associates (in particular Mr Bashirov), unlawfully extracted huge sums of money from the International Bank of Azerbaijan and channelled them into assets for himself and his family in the UK and elsewhere.
  • Those assets include, but are by no means limited to, the recoverable property at 12-14 Walton Street, and Mill Ride Golf Club,”
  • “I have identified property assets acquired in this manner on behalf of Mr Hajiyev and the Hajiyev family worth tens of millions of US dollars.
  • “The property includes high-value residential property in the UK, a villa in Sardinia purchased for EUR 10.7 million in 2007, a private jet purchased for USD 50 million, and rights in an oilfield worth USD 41 million.
  • “The acquisition of … 12-14 Walton Street and Mill Ride Golf Club, has therefore formed part of a much larger criminal enterprise.
  • “The structuring of the transactions for the purchase of these assets has been unjustifiably complex, with money flows transiting through shell companies in several ‘secrecy’ jurisdictions before arriving in the UK, making the ultimate source of funds extremely difficult to determine. This is consistent with a money laundering practice known as ‘layering’.”

The NCA document says:-

  • That the method deployed by Mr Hajiyev to plunder his bank was to use his position as chairman, the post he held between 2001 and 2015, “to arrange for loans to be granted to a multitude of companies pursuant to promissory note transactions and loan agreements”.
  • The loaned money was paid “into the IBA-Moscow bank accounts of a network of companies controlled by Mr Hajiyev's close associates, including Mr Bashirov” and that Mr Bashirov then “directed some of the funds towards the acquisition of high-value assets on behalf of the Hajiyev family, frequently employing a process of ‘layering’ to obfuscate the original source of the funds.”
  • “To facilitate these transactions, false or misleading documents and payment descriptions were generated to ensure that funds could be transferred across the international banking system” and that the “laundered funds” were “used to purchase tens of millions of dollars of high value assets on behalf of Mr Hajiyev and his family, with Mr Hajiyev's interest in those assets being concealed through the use of shell companies and informal nominee arrangements.”
  • To maintain the original loan repayments and avoid the fraud being detected, further loans were taken out, creating more debt, much of which has yet to be repaid. It puts the total losses to the International Bank of Azerbaijan at more than $3.5billion US dollars.

The NCA court document also discloses:-

  • That the Mill Ride Golf Club, the second of Mrs Hajiveva’s properties that it is targeting in the High Court action, was bought using another prominent law firm, Herbert Smith Freehills.
  • The firm knew that Mr Hajiyev was the ultimate purchaser of the golf club, but that the banker’s aides took “significant steps .. to ensure that Mr Hajiyev remained anonymous” which “included insisting that his solicitors remove his name from any invoice.”
  • That although Herbert Smith Freehills had sought to obtain evidence about how Mr Hajiyev had made the money being used to buy the golf club, it received “no documentary evidence” to support its assessment that he had “amassed his wealth through his employment at the International Bank of Azerbaijan”.
  • The law firm received only “vague and uncorroborated” responses, including a recommendation to consult Wikipedia, from Werner Capital, a London company providing “family office services” to Mr Hajiyev and his family, and a letter, provided via Werner Capital, from a “close colleague” of Mr Hajiyev’s at the International Bank of Azerbaijan.
  • The letter included “no actual explanation of the source of the funds” to be used in the golf club purchase, despite insisting that he had sufficient legitimate wealth.

Further detail in the court document includes:-.

  • The disclosure that a UK company, Kingsway Trading Ltd, involved in the alleged money laundering received more than $1billion US dollars from Mr Hajiyev’s bank, with some of the money “directed towards Mr Hajiyev’s personal assets, including 12-14 Walton Street”
  • The spending channelled through the company also included payments for “the private school fees of Mr and Mrs Hajiyev’s sons, and the costs of Mr Hajiyev’s stepdaughter’s wedding.”
  • In total “approximately $8.5million was paid to 30 accounts held in the UK” by Kingsway and that “12 of the .. accounts can be attributed to private schools, universities or purveyors of luxury items such as cars, jewellery and perfume.”

Nothing to see here says law firms:-

  • Both Mishcon de Reya and Herbert Smith Freehills were approached for comment and asked whether they could have done more to prevent the alleged money laundering.
  • Mishcon de Reya said it had complied with the money laundering regulations in place at the time of the Walton Street purchase in 2009.
  • The law firm added that it continued to “adopt rigorous and robust onboarding and anti-money laundering policies, controls and procedures and comply fully with our legal and regulatory obligations”.
  • Herbert Smith Freehills declined to provide any comment for publication.

Source

UNITED KINGDOM MONEY LAUNDERING

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.