News
Print Article

SFO secures first-ever UWO to investigate a £1.5m Lake District property linked to a £100m fraud.

18/01/2025

17 January 2025:- the SFO has secured its first-ever Unexplained Wealth Order to investigate a £1.5m Lake District property linked to a £100m fraud.

  • The property is owned by CLAIRE SCHOOLS, the ex-wife of jailed solicitor Timothy SCHOOLS, and is suspected of having been bought with criminal proceeds (SEE ADDITIONAL NEWS BELOW).
  • A High Court freezing order secured today ensures that any money from the house sale is secured while SFO investigates its funding.
  • Ms Schools has also been ordered to produce information within 28 days about how the property was obtained.
  • The SFO may use this information to bring a case to seize the house later.
  • The SFO is the second law enforcement authority to employ this tool. We remain committed to using new methods to combat fraud and recover illicit assets.

13 January 2025 = Timothy Schools, told to repay £1m from fraud or face more years in jail

The struck-off solicitor Timothy Schools, WHO WAS jailed for 14 years for the AXIOM LEGAL FINANCING FUND FRAUD,

  • Has been ordered to pay back £1.1m or face five years in jail.
  • The Proceeds of Crime Act hearing at Southwark Crown Court heard that the fraud led by Timothy Schools, 65, was worth around £146m when inflation was added to the £105m that was lost.

AXIOM LEGAL FINANCING FUND FRAUD

  • AXIOM The Cayman Islands-based fund – which lent money to law firms to pay for disbursements, mainly for personal injury cases – closed in October 2012 after four years in the wake of allegations of fraud and went into receivership in February 2013 owing investors around £120m.
  • Mr Schools was struck off in 2014, although the charges did not relate to the Axiom fund – which has no connection with the most recent alleged fraud at Axiom Ince.
  • More than 500 investors poured cash into the fund. Mr Schools received nearly £20m from it, using some of it to pay for an estate in Cumbria.
  • He also had a £45,000 corporate box at Blackpool FC’s home ground, claiming it was a business expense for corporate hospitality.
  • He owned Preston firm ATM Solicitors, given its name because he used it as “his cash machine”, his 2022 trial heard. He claimed it was a “cashpoint” for clients to conduct their litigation and receive compensation.
  • Axiom’s marketing material claimed investors’ cash would be held in the Cayman Islands and forwarded to an ‘independent panel’ of law firms that would pay it back with 15% interest.
  • However, Mr Schools only loaned money to a few firms and mainly went to firms Mr Schools was involved with.

TRIAL AND CONVICTION

  • Describing him as an “utterly dishonest man”, Judge Martin Beddoe sentenced him to eight years in prison for fraudulent trading and a further six for fraud itself, making a total of 14, following a five-month trial.
  • He was convicted of two further offences of fraudulent trading, which resulted in additional sentences of seven and eight years, running concurrently with the first two.
  • His appeal against sentence was rejected in 2023, while last year, David Kennedy, an investment manager at the heart of the fraud, was jailed for eight years for fraudulent trading.
  • Paul Raudnitz KC, prosecuting, told the court last week that the £1.1m would be available to compensate Axiom investors.
  • The Serious Fraud Office continued its investigation into Mr Schools’ assets.

READ MORE HERE:

FRAUD

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.