News
Print Article

The “3LoD” model was formally replaced some time ago by the “Three Lines” model and yes its different!!

10/06/2025

The Institute of Internal Auditors published the Three Lines of Defence model in January 2013. Its aim was to provide a comprehensive framework for considering the overall arrangements for managing risk and exercising control within an organisation.

The Three Lines of Defence Model (or 3LoD) was formally defined by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) in 2013, but has been used and referred to informally for almost two decades.

It was designed to provide a standardised corporate governance and risk management framework for the financial services sector. Though widely adopted, it has been criticised by many for not being fit for purpose. After an extensive review by an IIA working group and an advisory group of 30 industry experts, an updated framework document was published in July 2020 and given a new (but confusingly similar) name.

Now known simply as “The Three Lines Model,” the amended version, according to the IIA, aims to address some of the recurring issues and to help “better identify and structure interactions and responsibilities of key players toward achieving more effective alignment, collaboration, accountability and, ultimately, objectives.”

The Three Lines of Defence Model and the updated Three Lines Model both aim to enhance risk management and governance within organisations, but they differ in several key aspects:

Three Lines of Defence Model

  1. First Line: Operational management manages risks and implements controls.
  2. Second Line: Risk management and compliance functions, which monitor and facilitate effective risk management practices.
  3. Third Line: Internal audit, providing independent assurance on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and internal controls.

1-2-3

  1. The first line owns risk and risk management.
  2. The second line helps.
  3. The third line confirms that controls and processes are adequate. However, it doesn’t report the level of risk.

Updated Three Lines Model

  1. Principle-Based Approach: This approach focuses on six key principles rather than rigid lines, promoting collaboration and a holistic view of the organisation.
  2. Roles and Responsibilities: Governing bodies, executive management, and internal audit are not confined to strict lines but are integrated to enhance alignment, collaboration, and accountability.
  3. Flexibility: Encourages adaptability in risk management practices, allowing organisations to tailor the model to their specific needs and objectives.

Key Differences

  • Reactive vs. Proactive: The original model was seen as more reactive, with distinct barriers protecting the business from threats. The updated model emphasises proactive governance and risk management.
  • Collaboration: The new model fosters a more collaborative approach, with employees taking a holistic view of the business rather than focusing solely on their roles.
  • Integration: The updated model integrates roles and responsibilities more fluidly, aiming for better organisational alignment and accountability.

These changes aim to address criticisms of the original model, such as gaps in accountability and communication challenges, and to improve the support for achieving organisational objectives.

References

General

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.